aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/README.SSL
blob: c3ce0b02bb33c3dc480efeefc2162c6b2a11e3ac (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
Fetchmail client-side SSL support
=================================

Preface
-------

Note: there is a separate document "README.SSL-SERVER" describing the server- 
side requirements for proper SSL support.  It has checklist-style and is not 
specific to fetchmail. This document is about the client-side (fetchmail side)
setup.

In case of troubles, mail the README.SSL-SERVER file to your ISP and 
have them check their server configuration against it.

Note that fetchmail up to version 6.3.26 used to confuse SSL/TLS protocol 
levels with whether a service needs to use in-band negotiation (STLS/STARTTLS 
for POP3/IMAP4) or is totally SSL-wrapped ("Implicit TLS") on a separate port.
Fetchmail 6.4 seeks to fix that to some extent without breaking the 
command-line and rcfile interfaces too much (see --ssl and --sslproto options,
below and in the manual).

fetchmail 6.4.0 will auto-negotiate TLSv1 or newer only.

Fetchmail 6.4.25 supports OpenSSL 3.0 and 1.1.1 and WolfSSL 5.0.
Note that WolfSSL 5.0 is a bit less flexible about its trust store,
see INSTALL chapter 2.1 for details.

Note that many messages printed by fetchmail will print "OpenSSL"
even if wolfSSL is being used. Reason is that fetchmail uses
wolfSSL's OpenSSL compatibility layer and not the native wolfSSL API.

	-- Matthias Andree, 2021-12-05


Quickstart
----------

Use an up-to-date release of OpenSSL v1.1.1 or v3.0.0 or wolfSSL 5.0.0 or
newer, so as to get TLSv1.3 support.  Older OpenSSL versions are unsupported
upstream, and fetchmail rejects versions before v1.0.2f and warns about
versions before v1.1.1.

wolfSSL needs to be configured with --enable-opensslall --enable-harden,
else some required OpenSSL APIs are missing, especially for SNI (server name
indication), which is required to fetch mail from Google and some other mail
server providers.

In all four examples below, the (--)sslcertck has become redundant
since fetchmail v6.4.0, but since fetchmail 6.3 releases will be in circulation
for too long, (--)sslcertck will remain in the examples below for now.

For use of SSL or TLS on a separate port (recommended), called Implicit TLS,
the whole TCP connection is SSL-encrypted from the very beginning (SSL- or
TLS-wrapped), use these command line options (in the rcfile,
omit all leading "--"):

    --ssl --sslproto tls1.2+ --sslcertck

or these options in the rcfile (after the respective "user"... options)

      ssl   sslproto tls1.2+   sslcertck


For use of SSL or TLS with in-band negotiation on the regular service's port,
i. e. with STLS or STARTTLS, use these command line options (omitting --ssl or
ssl):

    --sslproto tls1.2+ --sslcertck

or these options in the rcfile (after the respective "user"... options)

      sslproto tls1.2+   sslcertck


With up to date OpenSSL libraries (1.1.1 or newer), and with recent
software on the server, you can alternatively configure tls1.3+.

For some older services, you may need to use tls1.1+ or tls1+ for compatibility 
instead of the tls1.2+ above.  In such situations, you should ask the service 
provider or server operator to upgrade their TLS implementation such that
TLS v1.3 be supported, and once that happens, update your fetchmail configuration
to tls1.3+ or tls1.2+.


Background and use (long version :-))
------------------

Using fetchmail's "ssl" and since 6.4.0 "sslproto" options,
you can have the data transferred between you and the server in an encrypted
form, so that eavesdropping should become practically impossible.

This works as follows: the server has a key pair (a secret and a public key), 
and it sends the client its public key. Messages encrypted with the public key 
can be decrypted using the private one and vice versa.

A symmetric session key (symmetric means that the same key is used for 
encryption and decryption) can now be agreed upon by the two parties using the 
secure channel the key pair builds. The session key is now used to encrypt the 
traffic.

In the fetchmail case, the client can now authenticate itself to the server by 
using the usual POP/IMAP/whatever authentication mechanisms.

However, so called man-in-the-middle attacks are still possible: in such 
a setting, an attacker pretends to be the server, and thus can e.g. get your 
authentication information if you do not use a challenge based authentication 
mechanism (because it is thought to be the real server, fetchmail will try to 
authenticate against it by telling it your password).

So, not only do you need to prove your identity to the server, the
server likewise needs to prove (authenticate) its identity to you.
  In the standard setting, the server has a certificate (the client can have 
a certificate too to prove its identity, but this is not covered by this 
document). This certificate contains the server's public key, some data about 
the server, and a digital signature and data about the signer.
  Digital signatures can also be made using a key pair as described earlier.

To check this certificate, you should use the new option "sslcertck" (fetchmail
6.4.0 and newer enable it by default). When it is specified, the signature of
the server certificate is checked against local trusted certificates to see
whether the owner of one of the certificates has signed that server
certificate, and if so, whether the signature is valid.
  So, if the server certificate is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), 
you put the CA's certificate into a directory where you keep trusted 
certificates, and point fetchmail to it. Fetchmail will then accept 
certificates signed by the owner of that certificate with the private key 
belonging to the public key in the certificate.
  You can specify this path using the "sslcertpath" option if it is 
different from the one OpenSSL uses by default.
  Alternatively, a "bundle" file (a concatenation of trusted certificates in PEM
form) can be given, using the "sslcertfile". 
  fetchmail 6.4.16 and newer will print the default locations where the SSL
library looks when run as fetchmail -V or fetchmail --version.

The idea is that the CA only gives certificates to entities whose identity it 
has checked and verified (and in this case, that the server name you specify 
does belong to it). So, if you trust the CA's verification process, you can be 
reasonably sure that if a certificate is signed by the CA, it really belongs to 
the server and owner that it claims to.

Certificates are only valid in a certain time window, so your system clock 
should be reasonably accurate when checking certificates.

Additionally, CAs keep Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) in which they note 
the certificates that are to be treated as invalid (e.g. because the server 
name has changed, another certificate was granted, or even because the 
certificate was not granted to the rightful owner).

The certificate directory must be hashed in a way OpenSSL expects it: each time 
you modify a file in that directory or add a file to it, you need to use the 
"c_rehash" perl script that comes with OpenSSL (in the tools/ subdirectory, in 
case that it is not installed). Additionally, you might need to convert the 
certificates to different formats (the PEM format is expected and usually is 
available, DER is another one; you can convert between both using the 
openssl(1) utility's x509 sub-mode).

The really paranoid (who chose to not trust a CA) can check the fingerprint of 
the public key that is used by the server. The fingerprint is a hash of that 
key that (hopefully) has few collisions and is hard to attack using a "birthday 
attack", i.e. nobody can generate a second key that hashes to the same value of 
the original key in reasonable time. So, if the fingerprint matches, you can be 
reasonably sure that you are talking to the original server, because 
only that server knows the secret key, and it is very hard to generate a 
matching secret key from the public key. If the fingerprint does not 
match, there might be an attack, but, before panicking, keep in mind 
that the server key may also have changed legitimately.

Fetchmail will present the fingerprint to you in verbose mode. You can have 
fetchmail check the fingerprint (using the "sslfingerprint" option, and giving 
the desired fingerprint as an argument).

The fingerprints fetchmail uses are MD5 sums. You can generate them e.g. using
openssl(1)'s "x509 -fingerprint" command. The format is a hexadecimal string 
with a ":" separating two bytes (i.e. a ":" between every two hex "digits"). The 
match is case insensitive since release 6.3.10 (upper-case digits A to F were 
required up to and including release 6.3.9).

	- Thomas Moestl <tmoestl@gmx.net>
	- Matthias Andree