From 9da65aa26b37b96fddc0649a5f5edf45d1e316c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:34:54 +0000 Subject: Make document valid XHTML again. svn path=/branches/BRANCH_6-3/; revision=5272 --- fetchmail-FAQ.html | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fetchmail-FAQ.html') diff --git a/fetchmail-FAQ.html b/fetchmail-FAQ.html index effae468..026c4a03 100644 --- a/fetchmail-FAQ.html +++ b/fetchmail-FAQ.html @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ introduced in the upper half of the sequence; if it doesn't, the failure was introduced in the lower half. Now bisect that half in the same way. In a very few tries, you should be able to identify the exact adjacent pair of versions between which your bug was -introduced. <STRONG>Please</STRONG> include session transcripts (as +introduced. <strong>Please</strong> include session transcripts (as described in the last bullet point above) of <strong>both the working and failing versions.</strong> Often, the source of the problem can instantly identified by looking at the differences in protocol @@ -485,8 +485,8 @@ fetchmail. It's a Mailman list, see <a <fetchmail-devel@lists.berlios.de> for people who want to discuss fixes and improvements in fetchmail and help co-develop it. It's a Mailman list, which you can sign up for at <a -href="http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fetchmail-devel">http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fetchmail-devel</a>. -There is also an announcements-only list, +href="http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fetchmail-devel">http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fetchmail-devel</a>.</p> +<p>There is also an announcements-only list, <fetchmail-announce@lists.berlios.de>, which you can sign up for at <a href="http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fetchmail-announce">http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fetchmail-announce</a>.</p> -- cgit v1.2.3