From d78b61e3efaea197a6e5b2b72bf2981a9ed69461 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Funk <rfunk@funknet.net> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 03:59:01 +0000 Subject: Add files from ESR's dev directory that weren't under version control svn path=/trunk/; revision=3881 --- RFC/lan-mail-protocols | 1330 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 1330 insertions(+) create mode 100644 RFC/lan-mail-protocols (limited to 'RFC/lan-mail-protocols') diff --git a/RFC/lan-mail-protocols b/RFC/lan-mail-protocols new file mode 100644 index 00000000..13e984ee --- /dev/null +++ b/RFC/lan-mail-protocols @@ -0,0 +1,1330 @@ + + SERVING DESKTOP COMPUTERS USING A CENTRAL MAIL SERVER ON AN INTERNET + + + _________________________________________________________________ + + Author + John Wobus, jmwobus@syr.edu (corrections welcome) + + Date + 2/4/1997 + + This file + http://web.syr.edu/~jmwobus/comfaqs/lan-mail-protocols.html + + Other LAN Info + http://web.syr.edu/~jmwobus/lans/ + + + _________________________________________________________________ + +Contents + + * Introduction + * List of Protocols and RFCs + * Other Sources of Information + * Capabilities of Well-known mail clients + * List of Implementations + * Some other packages for desktop systems + * Key and Other Issues + + + _________________________________________________________________ + +Introduction + + + + There are advantages to having a central server receive the mail + destined to desktop computers and having the desktop computer collect + the mail from the server on demand: + * Your desktop computer may be down quite a bit and less network + bandwidth and less of the processing resources of the sending + computer are used if the computer receiving your mail is ready to + receive. + * Some people use more than one desktop computer to read mail. + * A desktop computer may not have the resources to store all the + mail you receive. + * It can make your e-mail address more like other users'. + + + + The easiest way to "implement" this is to run the central mail server + like any multi-user system: let people sign on to it and use some mail + utility. Then desktop computer users can use "terminal sessions" to + sign on to the central mail server and read their mail (e.g. with Unix + "pine"). This has the disadvantage of making the desktop computer + users learn and use the central mail server's procedures. + + SMTP, the "internet" mail protocol used to deliver mail between + multi-user systems only supports mail transfer initiated by the sender + to actually, it has a method to initiate reception, but the method + didn't catch on and is not used). Other protocols have been devised to + allow a desktop computer to request transfer of mail, thus able to + make use of a central server. These include the published variants of + POP, IMAP, and DMSP. + + POP, POP2, POP3 + + + + These are rather minimal and are designed to be so. The three are + similar but not enough alike to be interoperable. They are basically + designed to identify the user by username and password, to transfer + the mail from server to desktop computer and to delete the mail + transferred. It is assumed that SMTP will be used to send mail. + Messages can be retrieved individually, but the only information you + can get about a message without transferring it is its length in + bytes-- useful for desktop computers with limited storage. + + POP3 has a number of optional extensions including Xtnd Xmit which + allows clients to send mail through the POP3 session rather than using + SMTP. Another extension is APOP which allows RSA MD5 encryption of + passwords passed over the network. + + POP3 is now by far the most-used variant of POP, but POP2 may still be + used at a few sites. POP3 has a couple of optional extensions: one to + avoid sending passwords, and one to aid in reading bulletin boards. + + IMAP2, IMAP2BIS, IMAP3, IMAP4, IMAP4REV1 + + + + The IMAP family is similar to the POP family, but also gives clients a + way to do string searches through mail that still resides on the + server. This is designed to allow the desktop computer to be more + selective as to which mail will be transferred. The POP protocols, on + the other hand, are designed for simpler server software. + + IMAP2 is used quite a bit. IMAP3 is an incompatible offshoot that has + not been implemented much. IMAP4 is a relatively recent extension of + IMAP2 which makes the servers cognizant of the MIME-structure of a + message. IMAP2bis was the original name of IMAP4, which has since been + refined, but there are/were some implementations of IMAP2bis that are + not IMAP4 compliant. IMAP4 also extends IMAP to have many other + features including some of DMSP's. IMAP4rev1 includes a few + enhancements to IMAP4. + + ACAP + + + + ACAP (Application Configuration Access Protocol), formerly IMSP + (Interactive Mail Support Protocol), is a protocol which is being + developed to compliment IMAP4 by offering related e-mail services + beyond the scope of IMAP4. It includes the ability to subscribe find & + subscribe to bulletin boards, mailboxes, and to find and search + address books. + + IMAP VS POP + + + + As of this writing (10/96), there are a many more POP than IMAP client + implementations and an Internet Service Provider is much more likely + to provide POP3 service than IMAP4. But interest in IMAP4 is growing + with big-time software houses announcing support. IMAP4 has more + features, basically designed to support a model where users store + their received mail on a server rather than on their own computer. The + big advantage cited for IMAP is that people who "do e-mail" from + different computers at different times have the same access to their + message store from any of the client-computers they use. The cost of + this model (aside from issues such as the complexity and the + availability of implementations) is in running a server with + sufficient space for the clients' message stores. With personal + computer disks now often above a gigabyte (presumeably growing to 10s + of gigabytes over the next few years) and multimedia messaging in our + future, people storing e-mail on their own hard disk will have a lot + of space and ways to use it. A central store serving 10-20 users will + not be overly difficult, but one for 1,000 or 10,000 users will be + very large (terabytes?) if it is to offer comparable space. The + question comes down to the tradeoff between the advantage to users who + computer-hop against the costs of managing the large amount of central + store. See also online document imap.vs.pop.html (reference below) and + section below "Issue of Remote Access". + + DMSP + + + + Also know as PCMAIL. Desktop computers can use this protocol to both + send and receive mail. The system is designed around the idea that + each user can own more than one workstation; however, the system + doesn't seem to handle the idea of a "public workstation" very well. + The desktop computers are assumed to hold state information about the + mail, a directory so to speak, and when the desktop computer is + connected to the server, this directory is updated to "reality". Note: + DMSP never gained the following of IMAP or POP and I've heard the + software is no longer available. + + WHO USES THESE PROTOCOLS? + + + + These protocols were designed and implemented mostly by + Internet-connected universities with some participation by other + Internet-connected research institutions. They were certainly devised + to handle the type of electronic mail that universities must do. A + typical site has probably 10 to 10,000 desktop computers and has an + Internet connection and also runs Unix, giving them the Unix sysadmin + expertise that makes running a Unix-based server attractive. Most of + the servers listed here run under Unix though some run under other + large systems and as time goes on, we are seeing more servers that run + on PCs and Macintoshes. + + A more recent use of these protocols has been by Internet Service + Providers and their customers. Internet Service Providers require a + way to offer e-mail services to however many customers they provide, + to customers who are connected to the network only part of the time. + Like a campus application, they may have 10 or 10,000 customers to + serve. These protocols offer a distinct advantage over SMTP for such + purposes and form an attractive complementary e-mail service for WWW + users. + + DISADVANTAGES + + + + There are a number of disadvantages associated with the use of these + protocols: + * since these have long been no more than a small part of the e-mail + market, software using these methods is often incompatible with + other useful and/or well-known software. A couple of examples are: + + Use of mail-enabled applications on desktop computers (there + is no fundamental reason that mail software using these + protocols can't provide the API used by mail-enabled + applications, but in general this hasn't come about yet) + + Use of the usual Unix mail readers & the Unix .forward files. + * since the server is holding mail for the person, the person can + use the server for storage. This leaves the potential for all the + disk-space problems inherent in shared disks: people hogging + disk-space or forgetting to clean up, etc. + * sizing the server: a perennial question people ask is "How big a + machine do I need to serve my campus (or department, or + whatever)". Naturally no one can give a straight answer because it + depends upon so many factors. + + ISSUE OF REMOTE ACCESS + + + + Modern commercial e-mail packages typically have features designed to + assist in remote access of ones e-mail. Features include: + * ability to download mail through a modem + * ability to synchronize two different systems which you are using + to read your e-mail by plugging them together. + + + + Any method of reading e-mail using PCs or Macintoshes can be used + remotely via remote control (the "PCanywhere(tm)" method, e.g. by + dialing up your own office PC/Macintosh and using one of the several + kinds of software that allow you to control your PC/Macintosh over the + phone). Also, any LAN-based method can be used by using one of the + several methods of providing the same protocol support over dialup + lines as are on LANs (SLIP or PPP for the above-mentioned, + TCP/IP-based protocols, ARA for Appletalk-based protocols, etc, and + sometimes using two different protocols, one incapsulated in the + other) under the constraint that any operations that use the network + will be much slower. Also, POP3 is sometime used directly over modems + (for example, Eudora can be used in this manner). + + The ideal protocol for remote access would not penalize the user for + the much slower communications speed (usually slower by a factor of + 100: note that a lot of LAN-based software was written without regard + to minimizing the necessary communication, thus is really hurt by such + slow speeds), yet would allow the same software to run both remotely + and locally, with a wonderful user interface. It would also not be + overly expensive in communications equipment or services. This is a + difficult set of objectives and the above-three protocols can achieve + some of them for some users, but what they actually achieve depends a + lot on the user's pattern of e-mail usage. If a user reads just a + small amount of mail, then we would not worry about the length of time + necessary to download it remotely with POP3, but if the person + receives a lot of mail, but just wants to read a small amount of it at + home, then with IMAP2, they could pick and choose what to read, + eliminating some download time. If someone is paying for the telephone + line time (possibly the user if it is a long distance call; in any + case, the institution pays a monthly fee for each line it offers, + which is dependent upon how many users it is serving, how often they + call, and how long their calls are) then IMAP2's natural method of + usage which requires the phone call to remain while a user is reading, + poking around, sending, and rearranging mail can be much more costly + than using POP3 if one call is used to quickly download all the mail + and another later call is used to send any replies. Thus with POP3 a + user might have two 1 minute calls before and after a 30 minute e-mail + session instead of keeping the call for 30 minutes with IMAP2, and + each phone line the institution offers could be serving 15 times as + many such users who would each pay a lot less in long-distance phone + bills. Note that with the advent of multimedia mail (see MIME below) + whose messages can be very large, it is possible that downloading even + one message that you end up not reading remotely could ruin such a + nice-sounding scenario. + + Note that with the growth of Internet Service Providers, remote access + is becoming the normal way for many people to do their e-mail, and + offering such services is one of the major growth areas for POP and + IMAP. + + MIME + + + + MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) is a relatively new + Internet standard for the format for messages with multiple parts, and + with non-ASCII data. Any client that can import or export files can + use MIME in a clumsy way if you have a program to create and/or decode + a MIME message. Some clients have built-in features to do this. + Client-server mail protocols generally only deal with entire messages, + and can retrieve MIME messages as well as any other messages since + MIME was carefully designed to be transparent to existing mail + systems. However, IMAP4 has features to allow retrieval of individual + parts of MIME-encoded messages. The chart below lists whether a + package has MIME support. Servers for protocols that don't offer any + special MIME features are marked na for Not Applicable since they need + do nothing for users to use MIME. All IMAP4 servers can also do this, + but the chart lists whether they include explicit MIME support. + + APPROACHES NOT COVERED BY THIS MEMO + * Proprietary protocols + * file sharing + * APIs + * X.400. + + + + Vendors can invent their own protocols similar to those listed above, + and some have. + + LAN e-mail can also be implemented using file sharing, e.g. using NFS + to allow separate Unix workstations to share the same mail spool area + just as if it were mail being stored on one system, or using Novell's + SMF (Simple Message Format) in a Novell file server. If the + applications are written so that they are careful to lock files + correctly, then this works. An advantage is that any network file + protocol can be used and the e-mail application can be somewhat + independent of the file protocol. For example, Unix systems could use + either AFS or NFS. Pegasus is a PC & Mac application that uses Novell + file service to do something similar. Specifications for client-server + interaction consist of the file service protocol along with the server + directory structures & conventions used for storing e-mail. + + A very popular approach with commercial vendors is the use of APIs. + The client talks to the server using an API (Applications Programming + Interface), i.e., a set of subroutine/procedure library call + definitions for a library providing subroutines/procedures to send, + receive, and manipulate e-mail. With the use of any remote procedure + call mechanism, the client can be located on a different computer from + the server. This allows some mixing and matching of RPC mechanisms, + underlying protocol stacks and APIs: e.g., a vendor defines an API, + and it can be run over IPX or TCP/IP, in each case over the protocol + stack's RPC mechanism. There are a number of APIs now being pushed by + vendors: MAPI (Microsoft); VIM (Lotus); AOCE (Apple). These API's have + been the basis for numerous mail-enabled applications: e.g. a word + processor that allows you to send or receive documents through e-mail + simply uses one of these APIs allowing it to communicate with any + server supporting the same API. Specifications for client-server + interaction consist of the protocol stack up to the RPC protocol, then + the API itself. + + Note that though the API approach in combination with remote procedure + calls allows one to implement client-server e-mail without the use of + the protocols covered by this document (IMAP, POP, etc), that there is + no theoretical reason why such APIs can't be used in an IMAP or POP + environment. The necessary software would be a "driver" or piece of + "middleware" that provides the APIs calls to mail-enabled applications + and uses POP, IMAP, or whatever over a LAN to reach a server. The + advantages/disadvantages of such an approach as compared to the use of + RPCs is open to debate. UniPalm's Mail-IT is an example of client + software that provides MAPI within the client and uses POP3 to access + the server. + + X.400 is the message transport defined for use between + telecommunications vendors and customers by the international + consortium of national standards bodies known as ISO. It roughly + corresponds to TCP/IP's SMTP and RFC822 header format. A consortium of + X.400 vendors (XAPIA) have developed an API for X.400 applications + called CMC. + + LDAP + + + + LDAP is a protocol (the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) being + incorporated in some clients as an Internet way for the client to get + information about e-mail addresses from a server, i.e. to give you the + capability to type in someone's name and have the mail client software + retrieve the address from a server-based directory. LDAP also has + other uses. There are plans to incorporate LDAP clients into some IMAP + and POP clients. LDAP is essentially an Internet-based, simplified + X.500-like protocol and one of the original intentions of its creators + was to be gatewayed to X.500, thus giving relatively simple Internet + clients access to X.500 servers. Both LDAP and X.500 provide a method + for naming, retrieving, and searching fields in a directory, but do + not define the field-names or what is supposed to go in the fields. + Thus server/client interoperability requires further conventions. + + JAVA + + + + Java is a programming language currently (1996) touted as a tool for + web-based applications. It can affect the use of LAN protocols in a + number of ways: first of all, POP or IMAP clients can be written in + Java, using its cross-platform development capabilities to create + version for a number of platforms. Second, clients could be written as + "Applets", i.e. applications designed to be downloaded into web + browsers such as Netscape from a server. With such a design, a user + would only need access to a web browser to see their e-mail, e.g. drop + into a library and see your e-mail from one of its Internet-browser + kyosks. Applets are not normally allowed to access the + client-machine's disk files (which would result in too much risk when + browsing the Internet from the kind of people who develop computer + viruses), so such an application fits a little better into the IMAP + model (server storage of e-mail folders) than the POP model (client + storage of e-mail folders). Thirdly, Applets enable more practical use + of e-mail clients that use non-standard protocols rather than POP or + IMAP; interoperability is achieved because the server itself + distributes a compatible client applet right when the user accesses + the server. + _________________________________________________________________ + +List of Protocols and RFCs + + + + Note: for up-to-date information on the RFCs, get an index from an RFC + repository. For up-to-date information on the state of each RFC as to + the Internet Standards, see the most recent RFC called "Internet + Official Protocol Standards". + +Name: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol +Nickname: SMTP +Document: RFC 821 (Postel, August 1982) +TCP-port: 25 +Status: Internet standard (STD 10) + +Name: Post Office Protocol, Version 2 +Nickname: POP2 +Document: RFC 937 (Butler et al, February 1985) +TCP-port: 109 +Status: Functionally replaced by incompatible POP3 but still used some + +Name: Post Office Protocol, Version 3 +Nickname: POP3 +Document: RFC 1939 (Myers & Rose, May 1996) +TCP-port: 110 (109 also often used) +Status: In use, standards track +Sites: UC Irvine, MIT + +Name Post Office Protocol, Version 3 Authentication command +Nickname: POP3 AUTH +Document: RFC1734 (Myers, December 1994) + +Name: Post Office Protocol, Version 3 Extended Service Offerings +Nickname: POP3 XTND +Document: RFC 1082 (Rose, November 1988) + +Name: Distributed Mail Service Protocol +Nickname: DMSP, Pcmail +Document: RFC 1056 (Lambert, June 1988) +TCP-port: 158 +Status: Used very little +Sites: MIT + +Name: Interactive Mail Access Protocol, Version 2 +Nickname: IMAP2 +Document: RFC 1176 (Crispin, August 1990) +TCP-port: 143 +Status: In use, being replaced by upward-compatible IMAP4 +Sites: Stanford, U Washington + +Name: Interactive Mail Access Protocol, Version 2bis +Nickname: IMAP2bis +TCP-port: 143 +Status: Experimental, but in use, being replaced by upward-compatible IMAP4 + +Name: Interactive Mail Access Protocol, Version 3 +Nickname: IMAP3 +Document: RFC 1203 (Rice, February 1991) +TCP-port: 220 +Status: Historical, not used +Sites: Stanford + +Name: Internet Message Access Protocol, Version 4 +Nickname: IMAP4 +Document: RFC 1730 (Crispin, December 1994) +TCP-port: 143 +Status: Implementations exist, being replaced by revised version IMAP4rev1 +Sites: U Washington +Related: RFC 1731 (Myers, December 1994), + RFC 1732 (Crispin, December 1994), + RFC 1733 (Crispin, December 1994) + +Name: Internet Message Access Protocol, Version 4rev1 +Nickname: IMAP4rev1 +Document: RFC 2060 (Crispin, December 1996) +TCP-port: 143 +Status: Being implemented, Standards track +Sites: U Washington +Related: RFC 2061 (Crispin, December 1996), + RFC 2062 (Crispin, December 1996) + +Name: Interactive Mail Support Protocol +Nickname: IMSP +Document: Draft RFC: ? (Myers, June 1995) +TCP Port: 406 +Status: Experimental, renamed ACAP +Sites: Carnegie Mellon + +Name: Application Configuratino Access Protocol +Nickname: ACAP +Document: Draft RFC: ? (Myers, June 1996) +Status: ? +Sites: Carnegie Mellon + + + + Note: The "I" in IMAP used to stand for "Interactive". Now it stands + for "Internet" and the "M" stands for "Message" rather than "Mail". + Also, Internet drafts are available at ds.internic.net, munnari.oz.au, + and nic.nordu.net in directory internet-drafts. IMAP2bis is + essentially an early version of IMAP4. + _________________________________________________________________ + +Other Sources of Information + + My own info + http://web.syr.edu/~jmwobus/lans/#imappop + http://web.syr.edu/~jmwobus/internet/ + + The IMAP Connection web site + + http://www.imap.org + Main page + + http://www.imap.org/products.html + List of IMAP implementations + + http://www.imap.org/imap.vs.pop.brief.html + Outlines differences between IMAP and POP. + + http://www.imap.org/imap.vs.pop.html + Same, with more detail. + + http://www.imap.org/biblio.html + Bibliography of IMAP Documents. + + Information from University of Washington + http://www.washington.edu/imap/ + + By anonymous ftp from ftp.cac.washington.edu + mail/* (miscellaneous information) + + Information from andrew2.andrew.cmu.edu + + http://andrew2.andrew.cmu.edu/cyrus/email/clients-IMAP.html + List of IMAP clients + + http://andrew2.andrew.cmu.edu/cyrus/acap/acap.html + The ACAP Home Page + + Mailing lists: + pop@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu + imap@cac.washington.edu + CW-EMAIL@EARNCC.EARN.NET + + By anonymous ftp from rtfm.mit.edu + This memo + comp.os.msdos.mail-news FAQ Memo + Mini FAQ on client-server mail protocols (similar to this memo + but shorter and more practical: + ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/news.answers/mail/mailclient-fa + q) + + Consortium + "The IMAP Consortium" (Getting under way as of March 1995). + + Page on MAPI API + http://www.wp.com/davidb/emapi.html + + + _________________________________________________________________ + +Capabilities of Well-known mail clients + + + + This section covers what I've been able to find out so far about the + well-known mail clients' ability to retrieve mail from a POP or IMAP + server. + +Client POP3 IMAP MIME +------ ---- ---- ---- +Apple PowerMail client ? ? ? +BeyondMail yes planned- yes +CE QuickMail client planned= planned= yes +Claris Emailer yes ? yes +DaVinci eMAIL client yes* ? yes* +Lotus cc:Mail Client no no no +Lotus Notes mail client no no ? +Microsoft Mail client no no no +Microsoft Exchange client yes+ no yes& +Netscape yes planned% yes + +Notes: +(-) Announced early 1996: target delivery: 4th quarter 1996. +(=) CE plans to rename the successor to their current client + QuickMail LAN, while introducing both a free and a commercial + POP3 client, then upgrade the commercial POP3 client to also + support IMAP. +(*) DaVinci SMTP eMAIL: I'm not sure if this is different from + the normal DaVinci client. +(+) Requires Internet Mail Client for Exhange, downloadable from + http://www.windows.microsoft.com or included in "Microsoft Plus". +(&) qp/base64 +(%) Planned for Netscape 4.0 + + + + + _________________________________________________________________ + +List of Implementations + + + +Prot Computer Implementation End MIME Source +------ ---------- ------------------- ---- ---- ------------------------------- +DMSP PC pc-epsilon (3.1) clnt ? allspice.lcs.mit.edu +DMSP PC pc-netmail (3.1) clnt ? allspice.lcs.mit.edu +DMSP PC pc-reader clnt ? allspice.lcs.mit.edu +DMSP Unix Pcmail 3.1 reposit. srvr na allspice.lcs.mit.edu +DMSP Unix/EMACS Pcmail 4.2 clnt ? allspice.lcs.mit.edu +DMSP PC PC/TCP 2.3 clnt ? FTP Software 8/4/94 +DMSP OS/2 PC/TCP clnt ? FTP Software +DMSP OS/2 TCP/2 clnt ? Essex Systems +DMSP OS/2 TCP/2 SERVER PACK srvr na Essex Systems +DMSP OS/2 TCP/2 ADV CLIENT clnt ? Essex Systems +IMAP1 MacOS MacMS 2.2.1 (obs) clnt no sumex-aim.stanford.edu* 7/13/95 +IMAP24 MacOS Mailstrom 1.04 clnt no sumex-aim.stanford.edu* 11/7/93 +IMAP24 MacOS Mailstrom 1.05 clnt no ftp-camis.stanford.edu 5/21/96 +IMAP24 MacOS Mailstrom 2(beta) clnt yes Tree Star Inc. 12/18/96 +IMAP? MacOS Mailstrom clnt ? lindy.stanford.edu 9/22/95 +IMAP? MacOS Mulberry (beta) clnt no mulberry@dial.pipex.com 7/30/96 +IMAP? MacOS Mulberry 1.1 clnt ? CyDaSoft 12/19/96 +IMAPb4 Mac/OT SIMEON 4.1 clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 8/5/96 +IMAPb4 MacOS SIMEON 4.1 clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 8/5/96 +IMAPb4 MS-WIN SIMEON 4.1 clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 8/5/96 +IMAPb4 WIN32 SIMEON 4.1 clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 8/5/96 +IMAPb4 Unix/Motif SIMEON 4.1 clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 8/5/96 +IMAP4 ? SIMEON SERVER srvr ? ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 8/1/96 +IMAP2 MacOS PathWay clnt no The Wollongong Group 2/25/94 +IMAP2 Unix/X PathWay clnt no The Wollongong Group 2/25/94 +POP3 MacOS PathWay clnt no The Wollongong Group 2/25/94 +POP3 Unix/X PathWay clnt no The Wollongong Group 2/25/94 +POP3 OS/2 ? (in testing) srvr no kf5mg@computek.net 11/28/95 +POP2 MacOS MacPOP 1.5 clnt ? ? 10/24/94 +POP2 MS-DOS PC POP 2.1 clnt ? ? 10/24/94 +POP3 MacOS TCP/Connect II clnt ? InterCon Systems Corp +POP3 MS-WIN TCP/Connect II f W clnt yes InterCon Systems Corp 7/8/94 +POP3 NeXT EasyMail clnt yes ftp.cac.washington.edu 11/7/93 +IMAP2 NeXT MailManager srvr yes ftp.cac.washington.edu 11/7/93 +IMAP2 TOPS20 MAPSER srvr na ? 11/7/93 +IMAP2 Unix imap kit srvr na ftp.cac.washington.edu 2/1/94 +POP23 Unix imap kit srvr na ftp.cac.washington.edu 2/1/94 +POP23 Unix IPOP srvr na ftp.cac.washington.edu 2/23/96 +IMAP4 Unix imap4 kit (alpha) srvr na ftp.cac.washington.edu 5/31/95 +IMAP24 Unix Pine 3.90 clnt yes ftp.cac.washington.edu 9/23/94 +IMAP24 Unix Pine 3.91 clnt yes ftp.cac.washington.edu 10/14/94 +IMAP2b Unix Pine 3.95 clnt yes ftp.cac.washington.edu 7/30/96 +IMAP24 Unix Pine 4.0 (future) clnt yes ftp.cac.washington.edu 7/30/96 +IMAP24 MS-DOSl+ PC-Pine 3.90 clnt yes ftp.cac.washington.edu 9/23/94 +IMAP24 MS-DOSl+ PC-Pine 3.91 clnt yes ftp.cac.washington.edu 10/14/94 +POP23r Unix popclient x.x (rep) clnt no Renamed 'fetchmail' 10/7/96 +IMAPb4 Unix popclient x.x (rep) clnt no Renamed 'fetchmail' 10/7/96 +POP23r Unix fetchmail 2.0 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 11/19/96 +IMAPb4 Unix fetchmail 2.0 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 11/19/96 +POP23r Unix fetchmail 2.2 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 12/10/96 +IMAPb4 Unix fetchmail 2.2 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 12/10/96 +POP23r Unix fetchmail 2.3 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 12/18/96 +POP3k Unix fetchmail 2.3 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 12/18/96 +IMAPb4 Unix fetchmail 2.3 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 12/18/96 +POP23r Unix fetchmail 2.6 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 12/18/96 +POP3k Unix fetchmail 2.6 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 12/18/96 +IMAPb4 Unix fetchmail 2.6 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 12/18/96 +POP23r Unix fetchmail 3.3 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 2/4/97 +POP3k Unix fetchmail 3.3 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 2/4/97 +IMAPb4 Unix fetchmail 3.3 clnt no www.ccil.org/~esr 2/4/97 +POP? Unix gwpop clnt ? ftp.pasteur.fr 2/9/96 +POP? Unix popc clnt ? ftp.imag.fr 2/9/96 +POP? Unix popmail clnt ? ftp.cic.net 2/9/96 +POP? Unix movemail clnt ? GNU 2/9/96 +IMAP2 VMS Pine 3.88 port clnt yes vms.huji.ac.il 4/12/94 +IMAP? VMS Pine in PMDF 4.3 clnt ? Innosoft 4/1/94 +IMAP2 VMS ImapD port srvr yes vms.huji.ac.il 4/12/94 +POP3u Win3/95/NT Navigator 2.x clnt yes Netscape 7/29/96 +IMAP? Windows? pcMail (future) clnt ? OzMail 3/19/96 +POP? Solaris Navigator 3.0b4(fut)clnt ? Netscape 6/25/96 +IMAP4 ? Navigator 4.0 (fut) clnt yes Netscape 7/30/96 +IMAP4 MacOS Navigator 4.0 (fut) clnt yes Netscape 12/18/96 +POP3 Macintosh6 Eudora 1.3.1 clnt no ftp.qualcomm.com 7/14/94 +POP3 Mac7/PM7 Eudora 1.5.3 clnt yes ftp.qualcomm.com 8/4/95 +POP3mr Macintosh7 Eudora 2.0.2 clnt yes Qualcomm 5/10/94 +POP3mr Mac7/PM7 Eudora 2.0.3 clnt yes Qualcomm 9/13/94 +POP3mrkMac7/PM7 Eudora 2.1 clnt yes Qualcomm 9/13/94 +POP3mrkMac7/PM7 Eudora 2.1.1 clnt yes Qualcomm 8/4/95 +POP3mrkMac7/PM7 Eudora 2.1.2 clnt yes Qualcomm 8/4/95 +POP3mrkMac7/PM7 Eudora 2.1.3 clnt yes Qualcomm 8/4/95 +POP3 MS-WINw Eudora 1.4.4 clnt yes ftp.qualcomm.com 6/23/95 +POP3 MS-WINw Eudora 1.5.2b1 clnt yes ftp.qualcomm.com 8/4/95 +POP3 MS-WINw Eudora 2.0.3 clnt yes Qualcomm 9/13/94 +POP3 MS-WINw Eudora 2.1.1 clnt yes Qualcomm 8/4/95 +POP3 WIN32 Eudora Pro 2.2b8 clnt yes Qualcomm 12/5/95 +POP3 WIN3/95/NT Eudora Pro ? clnt yes Qualcomm 7/29/96 +POP3 Mac Eudora Pro 3.0 clnt yes Qualcomm 8/14/96 +POP3 OS/2 PMMail 11 clnt yes hobbes.nmsu.edu 6/2/95 +POP3 OS/2 POP3D 12 srvr yes hobbes.nmsu.edu 6/2/95 +POP3 OS/2 POP3D 14A srvr yes hobbes.nmsu.edu 9/12/95 +POP3 OS/2 POP3D 14B srvr yes hobbes.nmsu.edu 4/5/96 +POP? OS/2 popsrv99.zip srvr ? hobbes.nmsu.edu 2/15/96 +POP3r OS/2 popsrv10.zip srvr na ftp-os2.mnsu.edu 3/15/96 +POP3 MS-WIN Mi'Mail clnt yes http://www.irisoft.be 6/30/95 + +IMAP2b Unix/XM ML 1.3.1 clnt yes ftp-camis.stanford.edu 7/13/95 +IMAP24 Unix/XM ML 2.0 (future) clnt yes Stanford 7/13/95 +IMAP1 Unix imapd 3.2 (obs) srvr na ftp-camis.stanford.edu 7/13/95 +IMAP2b Unix imapd 3.4/UW srvr ? ftp.cac.washington.edu 12/13/94 +IMAP2b Unix imapd 3.5/UW srvr ? ftp.cac.washington.edu 4/25/95 +IMAP2b Unix imapd 3.6.BETA srvr ? ftp.cac.washington.edu 4/25/95 +IMAP2b Unix imapd 4.0/UW (fut) srvr ? U Wash 4/25/95 +IMAP? Unix imapd 8.0(124) srvr ? U Wash 1/31/97 +IMAP? Unix imapd 9.0(161) srvr ? U Wash 1/31/97 +IMAP4 ? imap-4 srvr yes ftp.cac.washington.edu 10/25/96 +POP3u ? imap-4 srvr na ftp.cac.washington.edu 10/25/96 +IMAP4 ? imap-4.1 ALPHA srvr yes ftp.cac.washington.edu 10/25/96 +POP3u ? imap-4.1 ALPHA srvr na ftp.cac.washington.edu 10/25/96 +IMAP? Unix/X Palm (in dev) clnt ? UMiami 11/7/93 +IMAP? Unix/X Cyrus (dev on hold) clnt yes CMU 10/4/94 +IMAP Unix Cyrus 1.4 srvr yes ftp.andrew.cmu.edu 12/1/95 +POP3 Unix Cyrus 1.4 srvr na ftp.andrew.cmu.edu 12/1/95 +KPOP Unix Cyrus 1.4 srvr na ftp.andrew.cmu.edu 12/1/95 +POP3u Unix Cyrus ? srvr na 3/12/96 +IMAP41 Unix Cyrus 1.5 srvr yes ftp.andrew.cmu.edu 1/3/97 +POP3k Unix Cyrus 1.5 srvr na ftp.andrew.cmu.edu 1/3/97 +KPOP Unix Cyrus 1.5 srvr na ftp.andrew.cmu.edu 1/3/97 +IMAP4 ? Futr Andrew Msg Sys ? ? Carnegie-Mellon 9/20/94 +IMAP? Xrx Lsp Mc Yes-Way clnt yes Stanford U 11/7/93 +IMAP2b MacOS ECSMail clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 12/16/96 +IMAP2b MS-WINw ECSMail clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 12/16/96 +IMAP2 Unix/XM ECSMail Motif clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 12/16/96 +IMAP2b Solaris ECSMail clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 12/16/96 +IMAP2 MS-DOS ECSMail DOS clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 12/16/96 +IMAP? NT ECSMail clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 12/16/96 +IMAP? OS/2 ECSMail OS/2 clnt yes ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 12/16/96 +IMAP? Unix UMAIL clnt no umail@umail.umd.edu 11/7/93 +IMAP? Unix MS clnt no ftp.cac.washington.edu 11/7/93 +IMAP2 MS-WIN PathWay clnt no The Wollongong Group 2/25/94 +POP3 MS-WIN PathWay clnt no The Wollongong Group 2/25/94 +POP? MS-WIN PathWay Access 3.0 clnt ? The Wollongong Group 8/4/94 +POP3 NT sendmail/POP3 (bet) srvr na www.metainfo.com 9/15/95 +POP3 NT sendmail/POP3 srvr na emwac.ed.ac.uk 12/5/95 (www.emw +ac.ed.ac.uk) +IMAP4 NT sendmail/POP3 (fut) srvr ? emwac.ed.ac.uk 5/21/96 (www.emw +ac.ed.ac.uk) +IMAP2 Amiga Pine 3.8x (in dev) clnt yes UWashington 11/7/93 +POP MacOS POPmail 1.7 clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +POP23 MacOS POPmail 2.09b clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +IMAP2 MacOS POPmail 2.09b clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +POP23 MacOS POPmail 2.2 clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +IMAP2 MacOS POPmail 2.2 clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +POP3 MacOS POPmail/Lab clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +POP NeXT OS BlitzMail srvr na ftp.dartmouth.edu 10/23/95 +POP DEC OSF/1 BlitzMail srvr na ftp.dartmouth.edu 10/23/95 +POP AIX BlitzMail (in dev) srvr na ftp.dartmouth.edu 10/23/95 +POP3 MS-WINw5 POPmail/Lab clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +POP3 MacOS Emailer 1.1 clnt yes Claris 7/29/96 +POP3 MacOS OfficeMail srvr na Claris 6/6/96 +IMAP2b Unix imapperl-0.6 clnt ? dnpap.et.tudelft.nl 2/6/96 +POP2 MacOS MailStop 1.1.3 srvr na boombox.micro.umn.edu 1/18/94 +POP3r MacOS MailShare 1.0(beta) srvr na glenn.anderson@stonebow.otago.a +c.nz 8/16/94 +POP3r MacOS MailShare 1.0fc6 srvr na ftp.qualcomm.com 8/4/95 +POP3r MacOS AIMS 1.0 srvr na Apple 10/27/95 +POP3r MacOS AIMS 1.1 srvr na Apple 5/21/96 (www.cybertech.ap +ple.com) +POP3r MacOS AIMS 1.1.1 srvr na Apple 10/17/96 +POP3r MacOS AIMS 2.0 (fut: '97) srvr ? Apple 10/17/96 +POP3r MacOS AIMS 2.1 (fut) srvr ? Apple 10/17/96 +IMAP MacOS AIMS 2.1 (fut) srvr ? Apple 10/17/96 +POP3 MacOS POPGate 1.1 gway ? Stalker 3/25/96 (www.stalker.co +m) +IMAP? MacOS MailDrop 1.1 clnt ? ackmo.baylor.edu 3/22/96 +IMAP2? MacOS MailDrop 1.2d6a clnt ? ackmo.baylor.edu 3/22/96 +IMAP? MacOS MailDrop 2 (dev) clnt ? Baylor 1/19/96 +POP2 MS-DOS LifeLine Mail 2.0 clnt ? SunSelect 12/7/93 +POP23 MS-DOS SelectMail 2.1 clnt ? SunSelect 1/25/94 +POP2 MS-DOSk ? srvr na ucsd.edu +POP2 MS-DOSk net091b srvr na boombox.micro.umn.edu 12/3/93 +POP3 MS-DOSk pop3nos v1.86 srvr na boombox.micro.umn.edu 12/3/93 +POP2 MS-DOSp POPMail 3.2.2 clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +IMAP? MS-DOSp POPMail/PC 3.2.2 clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 1/11/94 +POP2 MS-DOSp POPMail 3.2.3 beta2 clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +IMAP? MS-DOSp POPMail 3.2.3 beta2 clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +POP3 MS-DOSk pop3serv srvr na biochemistry.crwu.edu +POP3 MS-DOSk nos11c-a.exe srvr na biochemistry.bioc.cwru.edu 9/16 +/94 +POP2 MS-DOS MD/DOS-IP clnt ? U Maryland +POP2 MS-DOS PC/TCP clnt ? FTP Software +POP2 OS/2 PC/TCP for OS/2 clnt ? FTP Software 11/2/93 +POP23 MS-WIN BW-Connect clnt no Beame & Whiteside 8/4/94 +POP3 MS-WIN Air Series 2.06 clnt no Spry 7/7/94 +IMAP? MS-WIN Air Mail ? ? AIR Co. Ltd 9/20/94 +IMAP? MS-WIN EMBLA ? ? ICL ProSystems 9/20/94 +IMAP4 ? Intrnt Msging Srvr srvr ? ICL TeamWare 9/8/1 +POP3 ? Intrnt Msging Srvr srvr ? ICL TeamWare 9/8/1 +POP23 MS-DOSp Minuet 1.0b18a(beta)clnt no minuet.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +POP? MS-WINls TCPMail clnt ? Pinesoft (pinesoft@net.com) +POP2 Unix U Minn popd 1.5c srvr na boombox.micro.umn.edu 11/19/93 +POP2 Unix/AIX aix_new_popd srvr na boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +POP2 Unix/HP9k hp9000_popd srvr na boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +POP23 MS-WINw POPmail clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +IMAP2 MS-WINw POPmail clnt ? boombox.micro.umn.edu 9/1/95 +POP2 Unix USC-ISI popd srvr na ? 10/24/94 +POP2 Unix imapd/ipop2d 3.4 srvr na ftp.cac.washington.edu 12/13/94 +POP3 Unix/curs Z-Mail Lite 3.2 clnt yes NetManage 8/23/96 www.netmanage +.com +POP3 Unix/line Z-Mail Lite 3.2 clnt yes NetManage 8/23/96 www.netmanage +.com +POP3 Unix/XM Z-Mail Motif 3.2.1 clnt yes NetManage 8/23/96 www.netmanage +.com +POP3 WIN3/95/NT Z-Mail 4.0.1 clnt yes NetManage 8/23/96 www.netmanage +.com +POP3 MacOS Z-Mail 3.3.1 clnt yes NetManage 8/23/96 www.netmanage +.com +IMAP4 WIN3/95/NT Z-Mail Pro clnt yes NetManage 8/23/96 www.netmanage +.com +IMAP4 WIN3/95/NT Z-Mail Pro 6.0 clnt yes NetManage 1/31/97 www.netmanage +.com +IMAP? MacOS Z-Mail ? clnt yes NetManage 5/21/96 +POP? Unix zync ? clnt ? NCD 9/23/94 (www.ncd.com) +POP23k UnixX xmh clnt ? ftp.x.org 2/15/94 +POP23k UnixX exmh clnt yes ? 8/8/95 +POP23k UnixX dxmail/mh clnt ? DEC +POP? Unix ucbmail clone clnt ? rtfm.mit.edu 12/16/94 +POP? Unix pop-perl-1.0 clnt ? sunsite.unc.edu 9/13/94 +POP? Unix/XO SXMail 0.9.74a (b) clnt ? ftp.uni-stuttgart.de 10/12/95 +POP2 VM FAL srvr na IBM +POP2 MS-WIN IBM TCP/IP for DOS clnt no IBM 7/7/94 +POP2 VM ? srvr na Texas Tech University +POP? VM ?POPD srvr na vmd.cso.uiuc.edu 2/4/94 +POP3 VM vmpop3.200 srvr na uriacc.uri.edu 1/10/95 +POP3 MUSIC/SP POPD 1.0 srvr na McGill Univ. Sys. Inc. 01/11/95 +POP2 OS/2 TCP/2 SERVER PACK srvr na Essex Systems +POP2 VMS MultiNet srvr na TGV, Inc. 07/26/95 +POP2 HP3000/MPE NetMail/3000 srvr na 3K Associates +POP3 ? NetMail/3000 srvr na 3K Associates +POP3k MacOS Eudora 1.3a8k clnt ? ftp.brown.edu 8/19/94 +POP3 MacOS MacPOP (Berkeley) clnt ? ftp.cc.berkeley.edu +POP3k MacOS TechMail 2.0 clnt ? net-dist.mit.edu +POP3 MacOS MacMH clnt ? jessica.stanford.edu/info +POP3 MacOS VersaTerm Link clnt ? Synergy Software 10/8/93 +POP3 MacOS LeeMail 2.0.2 (shw) clnt ? chs.cusd.claremont.edu 10/12/93 +POP3 Mac7pro Mail*Link Internet clnt yes StarNine Technologies 2/18/94 +POP3t Unix popper-1.7 srvr na ftp.cc.berkeley.edu 10/15/93 +POP3k Unix popper-1.7k srvr na ftp.brown.edu 10/19/94 +POP3k Unix hacked ucbmail clnt no UCSC 6/29/95 +POP3k Unix hacked pine clnt yes UCSC 6/29/95 +POP3 Unix popper-1.831 srvr na ftp.cc.berkeley.edu 11/3/93 +POP3 Solaris2.X popper-1.831/uore srvr na ftp.uoregon.edu 10/19/93 +POP3 Solaris2.X popper-1.9 srvr na ftp.chalmers.se 7/26/94 +POP3 Unix popperQC3 srvr na ftp.qualcomm.com 8/4/95 +POP3 Unix qpopper 2.1.3-r5 srvr na ftp.qualcomm.com 8/4/95 +POP3 Unix qpopper 2.1.4-r1 srvr na ftp.qualcomm.com 8/4/95 +POP3u Unix qpopper 2.1.4-r3 srvr na ftp.qualcomm.com 2/26/96 +POP3u Unix qpopper 2.1.4-r4 srvr na QualComm 5/16/95 +POP3r Unix Vers of qpopper srvr na QualComm 1/26/96 +POP3u Unix qpopper 2.2 beta srvr na Qualcomm 2/26/96 +POP? Unix zpop srvr na NCD 9/1/95 +POP3 Unix popper.rs2 srvr na ftp.qualcomm.com 8/4/95 +POP3 Unix perl popper srvr na ftp.xensei.com/users/ccrlphr 9/ +1/95 +POP23k Unix mh-6.8 (UCI RandMH) both yes ftp.ics.uci.edu 8/30/94 +POP23krUnix mh-6.8.3 (UCI RndMH)both yes ftp.ics.uci.edu 9/27/94 +POP23 Unix/EMACS RMAIL clnt no ? 8/2/95 +POP23 Unix/EMACS vm clnt no ftp.uu.net 8/2/95 +POP3 Linux miniclient clnt ? sunsite.unc.edu 8/30/94 +POP3 Unix imapd/ipop3d 3.4 srvr na ftp.cac.washington.edu 12/13/94 +POP3 Unix pop3d 1.004 srvr na ftp.ucdavis.edu 12/3/93 +POP2 Unix pop2d 1.001 srvr na ftp.ucdavis.edu 12/3/93 +POP3 Unix mush 7.2.5 clnt ? ? 12/16/94 +POP23k Unix popmaild srvr na ftp.wu-wien.ac.at 4/5/95 +IMAP AIX imap server srvr ? ftp.wu-wien.ac.at 4/5/95 +POP3 MacOS/AOCE MailConnect clnt yes ? 7/5/95 +POP3t MS-DOSnpo PC/TCP clnt ? FTP Software +POP3 OS/2 PC/TCP for OS/2 clnt ? FTP Software 11/2/93 +POP3 MS-DOS TechMail(future) clnt ? ? +POP3 MS-WINl TechMail for Wind. clnt ? net-dist.mit.edu 2/25/94 +POP3 OS/2l TechMail for Wind. clnt ? net-dist.mit.edu 2/25/94 +POP3 MS-DOSp NUPop 1.03 clnt no ftp.acns.nwu.edu 11/5/93 +POP3 MS-DOSp NUPop 2.02 clnt no ftp.acns.nwu.edu 1/18/94 +POP3 MS-DOSp NUPop 2.10 (alpha) clnt yes ftp.acns.nwu.edu 6/10/94 +POP23 MS-WINw Trumpet clnt no ftp.psychol.utas.edu.au 7/7/94 +POP3 MS-WIN Pceudora clnt ? ftp.qualcomm.com 9/24/93 +POP3 MS-WINw WinPmail 2.0b4 clnt ? risc.ua.edu 6/6/95 +POP3 MS-DOSp POPgate (Pmail gw) clnt ? risc.ua.edu 4/1/94 +POP3 MS-DOSl PMPOP (Pmail gw) clnt ? risc.ua.edu 4/1/94 +POP3x MS-WIN WinQVT (2.1) clnt ? QPC Software (shareware) 7/12/9 +4 +POP3 MS-WINp wnqvtnet 3.0 clnt ? ftp.cica.indiana.edu +POP3 MS-WINp wnqvtnet 3.9 clnt ? ftp.cica.indiana.edu 2/1/94 +POP3 MS-WIN Open Systems Mail clnt ? Pine Software +POP3 MS-WIN? IMAIL both ? Ipswitch 7/12/94 +POP3 NT Ipswitch srvr ? Ipswitch 5/24/96 +POP3 VMS IUPOP3 v1.7 srvr na ftp.indiana.edu 7/25/94 +POP3 VMS IUPOP3 v1.7-CMU-TEK srvr na ftp.indiana.edu 7/25/94 +POP3 VMS IUPOP3 v1.8-1 srvr na ftp.indiana.edu 7/25/94 +POP3 MS-DOS POP3 0.9 clnt na ftp.indiana.edu 7/25/94 +POP3 VMS MultiNet both ? TGV, Inc. 07/26/95 +POP3 VMS PMDF 5.1 srvr na Innosoft 9/24/96 www.innosoft.c +om +POP3 Solaris PMDF 5.1 srvr na Innosoft 9/24/96 www.innosoft.c +om +POP3 DigUNIX PMDF 5.1 srvr na Innosoft 9/24/96 www.innosoft.c +om +POP3 OpenVMS PMDF 5.1 srvr na Innosoft 9/24/96 www.innosoft.c +om +IMAP? VMS PMDF 5.1 srvr ? Innosoft 9/24/96 www.innosoft.c +om +IMAP? Solaris PMDF 5.1 srvr ? Innosoft 9/24/96 www.innosoft.c +om +IMAP? DigUNIX PMDF 5.1 srvr ? Innosoft 9/24/96 www.innosoft.c +om +IMAP? OpenVMS PMDF 5.1 srvr ? Innosoft 9/24/96 www.innosoft.c +om +IMAP? MS-DOS PMDF E-mail Interc clnt ? Innosoft 3/2/94 www.innosoft.co +m +IMAP? MacOS PMDF E-mail Interc clnt ? Innosoft 3/2/94 www.innosoft.co +m +POP? VMS PMDF E-mail Interc ? ? Innosoft 6/24/96 www.innosoft.c +om +IMAP? VMS PMDF E-mail Interc ? ? Innosoft 6/24/96 www.innosoft.c +om +POP3r VMS PMDF popstore clnt ? Innosoft 9/24/96 www.innosoft.c +om +IMAP4 SolarisX Roam (Future) clnt ? Sun 9/26/95 +IMAP? Windows? Roam (Future) clnt ? Sun 3/19/96 +IMAP4 SolarisX imapd (Future) clnt ? Sun 9/26/95 +IMAP4 Solaris Solstice IMS1.0 srvr yes SunSoft 10/17/96 http://www.sun +.com +POP3 Solaris Solstice IMS1.0 srvr yes SunSoft 10/17/96 http://www.sun +.com + +IMAP4 Solaris Solstice IMS2.0 (f) srvr yes SunSoft 10/17/96 http://www.sun +.com +POP3 Solaris Solstice IMS2.0 (f) srvr yes SunSoft 10/17/96 http://www.sun +.com +IMAP4 Solaris Solstice IMC0.9 clnt yes SunSoft 4/5/96 http://www.sun.c +om +IMAP4 Solaris Solstice IMC? (fut) clnt yes SunSoft 4/5/96 http://www.sun.c +om +IMAP4 MS-WIN3.11 Solstice IMC0.9 clnt yes SunSoft 4/5/96 http://www.sun.c +om +IMAP4 MS-WIN3.11 Solstice IMC? (fut) clnt yes SunSoft 4/5/96 http://www.sun.c +om +IMAP4 MS-WIN95 Solstice IMC0.9 clnt yes SunSoft 4/5/96 http://www.sun.c +om +IMAP4 MS-WIN95 Solstice IMC? (fut) clnt yes SunSoft 4/5/96 http://www.sun.c +om +IMAP4 NT Solstice IMC0.9 clnt yes SunSoft 4/5/96 http://www.sun.c +om +IMAP4 NT Solstice IMC? (fut) clnt yes SunSoft 4/5/96 http://www.sun.c +om +IMAP4 Win95 SOlstice 2.0 clnt ? SunSoft 1/31/97 +POP3 OS/2 TCP/2 SERVER PACK srvr na Essex Systems +POP3 OS/2 TCP/2 ADV CLIENT clnt ? Essex Systems +POP? MS-DOS UCDmail clnt ? ftp.ucdavis.edu 10/24/94 +POP? MS-DOS PC POP clnt ? ?Bill Schweickert/Sterling Fed +POP23 MS-WINnpo Super-TCP for W e.0 clnt yes Frontier Technologies 6/10/94 +POP? MS-WINnpo Super-TCP for W e.0 srvr yes Frontier Technologies 7/12/94 +POP3 WIN3/95/NT SuperHghwy Access 2 clnt yes Frontier Technologies 7/29/96 +POP? MS-WINw Windows ELM clnt ? lister.cc.ic.ac.uk 7/12/94 +IMAP? ? ELM patches clnt ? www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/e +lm/patches 7/16/96 +POP23 MS-DOSni ChameleonNFS both ? NetManage 8/4/94 +POP23 MS-DOSni Chameleon beta clnt yes NetManage +POP23 MS-WINw Internet Chameleon clnt yes NetManage 7/12/94 +POP23 NT Chameleon V5.0 f NT both ? NetManage 11/28/95 +IMAP? Windows? Chameleon (future) clnt ? NetManage 3/19/96 +POP? MacOS MEWS clnt ? ? +POP? MacOS byupopmail clnt ? ? +POP? VM ? srvr na TTUVM1 +POP3 MacOS HyperMail ? ? ? +? OS/2 lamailpop ? ? ftp-so2.cdrom.com +POP? OS/2 Popclient clnt yes ? 1/19/96 +POP? OS/2 Emacs 19.xx clnt yes ? 1/19/96 +POP3 MS-DOSs pcelm clnt ? lister.cc.ic.ac.uk 1/25/94 +POP3 MS-WINs winelm clnt ? lister.cc.ic.ac.uk 1/25/94 +POP3 NetWare Mercury 1.11 srvr na risc.ua.edu 2/4/94 +POP3 NetWare34 Mercury 1.2.1 srvr na risc.ua.edu 3/29/96 +POP3 NetWare34 Mercury 1.3 srvr na risc.ua.edu 8/2/96 +POP3 MS-WINw IMail srvr na Ipswitch 7/15/94 +POP3 MS-Windows Pegasus/Win 2.3 clnt ? risc.ua.edu 6/6/96 +POP3 MS-Windows Pegasus/Win 2.2(r3) clnt ? risc.ua.edu 6/6/96 +POP3 MS-Windows Pegasus/Win 2.0(r1) clnt ? risc.ua.edu 6/6/96 +POP3 MS-DOS Pegasus/DOS 3.2(r2) clnt ? risc.ua.edu 6/6/96 +POP3 MacOS Pegasus/MAC 2.1.2 clnt ? risc.ua.edu 6/6/96 +POP23 MS-WINw Mail-IT 2 clnt yes mail-it@unipalm.co.uk 7/12/94 +POP23 Unix Mail-IT 2 clnt yes mail-it@unipalm.co.uk 9/9/94 +POP23 Unix servers w Mail-IT srvr na mail-it@unipalm.co.uk 12/16/94 +POP? MS-WIN RFD Mail 1.22 clnt ? ftp.std.com 7/19/94 +POP? MS-WIN RFD Mail 1.23 clnt ? ftp.std.com 9/16/94 +POP3 MS-WINw ws_gmail srvr na buckshot.usma.edu 9/16/94 +POP3 MS-WINw IMAIL srvr na Ipswitch 9/16/94 +POP3 MS-WINw Pronto Mail 2.01 clnt yes Commtouch 4/24/96 (www.commtouc +h.com) +IMAP MS-WINw Pronto clnt yes Commtouch 9/5/95 +IMAP4 ? Pronto97 clnt yes CommTouch 1/7/97 (www.commtouch +.com) +POP3 ? Pronto97 clnt yes CommTouch 1/7/97 (www.commtouch +.com) +POP23 MS-WINw Turnpike clnt yes Turnpike Ltd, http:www.turnpike +.com 8/11/95 +POP3 MS-WIN WinSmtp srvr na Seattle Labs, http://wildside.k +wnet.on.ca/winsmtp.html 11/3/95 +POP3r WIN95 SLmail95 srvr na http://www.seattlelab.com/ 5/14 +/96 +POP3r NT SLmailNT srvr na http://www.seattlelab.com/ 3/29 +/96 +POP3 ? VA Professional clnt yes Ashmount 4/30/96 http://www.asn +mount.com +POP3 ? VA Workgroup clnt yes Ashmount 4/30/96 http://www.asn +mount.com +POP3 NT post.office srvr na Software.com, Inc. 12/11/95 (ww +w.software.com) +POP3 Solaris post.office srvr na Software.com, Inc. 12/11/95 (ww +w.software.com) +POP? MS-? Exchange clnt ? Microsoft 10/24/95 +POP3 MS-? Exchange Server (f) srvr yes Microsoft 9/11/96 +IMAP4 MS-? Exch Server (maybe) srvr ? Microsoft 6/21/96 +POP3 MS-? Exchange Server 5.0 srvr ? Microsoft 1/14/97 +POP3 MS-? Inter. Mail & News clnt yes Microsoft 6/4/96 (www.microsoft +.com) +POP3 MS-? Inter. Mail Service gway ? Microsoft 6/4/96 (www.microsoft +.com) +POP3u NT Exchpop(?) 1.0 gway yes http://www.sts.co.il/pop3.htm 6 +/14/96 +POP3 MacOS Powertalk ? ? ? 11/7/95 +IMAP2 MS-WIN Siren Mail clnt yes Siren Software 12/28/95 +IMAP? Windows? Siren Mail 3.0 clnt yes Siren Software 3/19/96 +POP3 MS-WIN Siren Mail clnt yes Siren Software 12/28/95 +IMAP2 WIN95 Siren Mail clnt yes Siren Software 12/28/95 +POP3 WIN95 Siren Mail clnt yes Siren Software 12/28/95 +IMAP2 NTclient Siren Mail clnt yes Siren Software 12/28/95 +POP3 NTclient Siren Mail clnt yes Siren Software 12/28/95 +? Unix Siren Mail srvr ? Siren Software 12/28/95 +IMAP2 ? Siren Mail Server srvr ? Siren Software 8/1/96 +POP3 ? Siren Mail Server srvr ? Siren Software 8/1/96 +IMAP4 ? Siren Mail (future) clnt yes Siren Software 12/28/95 +IMAP? MacOS Siren Mail (future) clnt yes Siren Software 1/21/96 +IMAP? WIN95 Siren Mail (beta) clnt yes Siren Software 7/30/96 +POP3 MacOS NetAlly srvr na Delphic (www.delphic.com) 11/17 +/95 +POP3 DOSWIN BeyondMail clnt yes Banyan (beyondmail.banyan.com) +2/6/96 +IMAP4 ? BeyondMail (future) clnt yes Banyan (beyondmail.banyan.com) +9/6/96 +POP? NT MailSrv from Res K. srvr na Microsoft? +IMAP WIN? ? clnt ? Email connection 12/8/95 +POP3 NetWare34 SoftNet WEBserv srvr na Puzzle Systems 12/15/95 (info@p +uzzle.com) +POP3 NT Netscape Mail Srvr srvr na Netscape 12/18/95 (info@netscap +e.com) +POP3 SunOS Netscape Mail Srvr srvr na Netscape 12/18/95 (info@netscap +e.com) +POP3 Solaris Netscape Mail Srvr srvr na Netscape 12/18/95 (info@netscap +e.com) +IMAP4 NT Netscape M S 2.0(f) srvr ? Netscape 6/21/96 +IMAP4 NT Netscape M S 2.02 srvr ? Netscape 1/31/97 +POP3 OpenVMS TCPware Internet Sr srvr na Process Software 12/20/95 (info +@process.com) +POP3 Unix UMT (beta) clnt ? ftp.topaz.kiev.ua 12/29/95 (www +.topaz.kiev.ua) +POP3 NetWare 4 LAN WorkGroup 5 ???? na Novell 1/1/96 +IMAP2 Solaris MMail clnt yes Atelier de Software Ltd. 5/21/9 +6 +IMAP2 MacOS MMail (planned) clnt yes Atelier de Software Ltd. 5/21/9 +6 +POP? OS/2 Yarn/Souper(?) clnt ? ? 1/16/96 +POP3 NT Sendmail w POP3 1.0 srvr na MetaInfo 1/19/96 http://www.met +ainfo.com +POP3 NT Sendmail w POP3 1.1 srvr na MetaInfo 12/4/96 http://www.met +ainfo.com +POP3 ? PopGate gway na ftp.esi sys.com 1/19/96 +POP3 OS/2 ? (future) srvr na Secant 1/23/96 +?POP3 NT NT MAIL ? ? http://bhs.com 1/26/96 +POP3 NT MAILbus Internet srvr na Digital 2/20/96 (www.digital.co +m) +POP3 DEC UNIX MAILbus Internet srvr na Digital 2/20/96 (www.digital.co +m) +POP3r NT MAILbus Internet(b) srvr na Digital 2/20/96 (www.digital.co +m) +POP3r DEC UNIX MAILbus Internet(b) srvr na Digital 2/20/96 (www.digital.co +m) +POP? OS/2 lampop(?) clnt ? ? 1/26/96 +POP? NT NTMail clnt ? www.mortimer.com 2/9/96 +POP3 DOSWINMac OpenMail (future) clnt ? HP 3/29/96 http://www.openmail. +external.hp.com +IMAP DOSWINMac OpenMail (future) clnt ? HP 3/29/96 http://www.openmail. +external.hp.com +POP3 NetWare4 Connect2SMTP srvr ? Infinite Technologies 3/29/96 +POP3 OS/2 PowerWeb Server++ srvr na CompuSource 4/16/96 http://www. +compusource.co.za +POP3 OS/2 SIDIS/2 srvr na stargate.rz.fh-offenburg.de 6/4 +/96 +POP3 ? WIG v2.0 gway ? http://www.demon.co.uk/ 4/19/96 +POP3 WIN95 Windis32 srvr na Demon Internet 6/6/96 (www.demo +n.co.uk) +POP3 DOSWINMac DaVinci SMTP eMAIL clnt yes On Technology 4/24/96 +POP? WIN32 Mail OnNet (OnNet32)clnt yes FTP Software 5/3/96 (www.ftp.co +m) +POP? Unix xfmail clnt ? burka.netvision.net.il 5/110/96 +POP3rutOS/2 POP3s v1.01 srvr ? www.secant.com 5/14/96 +POP3 Java Aplt Yamp clnt ? www.mcs.net/~faisal/Yamp/yampix +.html 5/24/96 +POP3 NT NT Mail gway ? www.net-shopper.co.uk 5/31/96 +POP3 WIN? Mailcall chkr na ? 6/11/96 +POP3 WIN? Mailcheck chkr na ? 6/11/96 +POP3 DOS C2SMTP srvr na Infinite Technologies 6/11/96 +POP MacOS Quarterdeck v4(fut) clnt yes Starnine 6/11/96 (www.starnine. +com) +POP MacOS List Star ? ? Starnine 6/24/96 (www.starnine. +com) +POP3 MacOS Marionet 1.0 srvr na Allegiant 6/12/96 (www.allegian +t.com) +POP3 ? Mailcoach V1.0 srvr na http://www.multi.se/ymex/mailco +ach.htm 6/14/96 +IMAP4 WIN3/NT/95 JetMail clnt yes NetManage 7/29/96 +POP3 WIN3/NT/95 JetMail clnt yes NetManage 7/29/96 +POP3 NT Post.Office srvr na NetManage 8/22/96 www.netmanage +.com +POP3 SunOS Post.Office srvr na NetManage 8/22/96 www.netmanage +.com +POP3 Solaris Post.Office srvr na NetManage 8/22/96 www.netmanage +.com +POP3 Unix Z-Pop 1.0 srvr na NetManage 8/22/96 www.netmanage +.com +POP3 AppleShare FutureShare (fut) srvr na Apple 6/14/96 +POP? ? Applixware ? ? Applix 6/24/96 +POP3 Unix Mail*Hub srvr ? CDC 10/23/96 www.cdc.com +IMAP4 Unix Mail*Hub srvr ? CDC 10/23/96 www.cdc.com +POP? Unix TkRat clnt ? www.dtek.chalmers.se/~maf/ratat +osk 6/24/96 +IMAP? Unix TkRat clnt ? www.dtek.chalmers.se/~maf/ratat +osk 6/24/96 +IMAP? Unix Elm clnt ? ? 7/1/96 +POP3 WIN16/32 Virtual Access clnt yes www.ashmount.com 8/9/96 +POP3 ? pop-perl5 clnt ? ? 7/23/96 +POP3 WIN95 Agent clnt ? ? 7/23/96 +POP3 ? Mail eXtension 1.60 clnt ? Terckland 7/26/96 (ourworld.com +puserve.com/homepages/mailx) +POP3 WIN3/95/NT Emissary Office 1.1 clnt yes Attachmate 7/29/96 +POP3 WIN3/95 Pronto Mail 2.0 clnt yes CommTouch 7/29/96 +POP3 ? gcMail 081b (beta) clnt ? www.greencedars.com 8/9/96 +POP3r Java shareware Java cls clnt ? Koehn Consulting 8/2/96 +POP3 ? cucipop (future) srvr na cuci.nl 8/6/96 +POP3 MacOS QuickMail Pro clnt ? CE Software www.cesoft.com 12/1 +9/96 +POP3 ? QuickMail Pro (fut) clnt ? CE Software www.cesoft.com 8/9/ +96 +IMAP? ? QuickMail Pro (fut) clnt ? CE Software www.cesoft.com 8/9/ +96 +POP3 ? QuickMail POP (fut) clnt ? CE Software www.cesoft.com 8/9/ +96 +POP3 ? QM-Internet Gateway ? ? CE Software 6/24/96 +POP3 ? Lotus Notes 4.5 srv srvr ? Lotus 10/17/97 +POP3 Be BeMail clnt ? www.be.com 11/25/96 +POP3 NT Metainfo/Intergate srvr na ? 11/26/96 +POP3 Java Novita Mail clnt ? Novita Comm 12/10/96 +IMAP? Java Novita Mail clnt ? Novita Comm 12/10/96 +IMAP? Windows Winbox 3.1 Beta 1 clnt ? ftp.uv.es 12/13/96 +POP? Windows Winbox 3.1 Beta 1 clnt ? ftp.uv.es 12/13/96 +POP3 MacOS Bluto (future) clnt yes Bare Bones www.barebones.com 12 +/18/96 +POP3 WIN95/NT ExpressIT! 2000 clnt ? Infinite Technologies www.ihub. +com 1/14/97 +IMAP WIN95/NT ExpressIT! 2000 clnt ? Infinite Technologies www.ihub. +com 1/14/97 +------ ---------- ------------------- ---- ---- ------------------------------- + + + _________________________________________________________________ + +Some other packages for desktop systems + + +------ ---------- ------------------- ---- ---- ------------------------------- +? MS-DOSs CMM peer ? Cinetic Systems 1/25/94 +? MS-DOSs WinMail 1.1a peer ? Obsolete +SMTP MacOS LeeMail 1.2.4 peer ? Shareware, laf@mitre.org +SMTP MacOS LeeMail 2.0.2 (shw) peer ? chs.cusd.claremont.edu 10/12/93 +SMTP MS-DOSni ChameleonNFS peer ? NetManage 2/25/94 +SMTP MS-WINw ws_gmail peer ? buckshot.usma.edu 5/26/94 +uucp MacOS FernMail peer ? Shareware, dplatt@snulbug.mtvie +w.ca.us +prop MacOS MacPost both ? ftp.lu.se 10/19/93 +uucp MacOS Eudora >1.3.1 peer yes ftp.qualcomm.com 5/10/94 +MAPI WIN3/95/NT Eudora Pro ? clnt yes Qualcomm 7/29/96 +uucp MacOS UUPC peer ? dplatt@snulbug.mtview.ca.us +uucp MacOS gnuucp peer ? jim@fpr.com +uucp MS-DOS waffle peer ? ? dell@vox.darkside.com 10/24/9 +4 +uucp MS-DOS UUPC peer ? ? help@kew.com 10/24/94 +fshare MS-Windows Pegasus/Win 2.3 clnt ? risc.ua.edu 6/6/96 +fshare MS-Windows Pegasus/Win 2.2(r3) clnt ? risc.ua.edu 6/6/96 +fshare MS-Windows Pegasus/Win 2.0(r1) clnt ? risc.ua.edu 6/6/96 +fshare MS-DOS Pegasus/DOS 3.2(r2) clnt ? risc.ua.edu 6/6/96 +fshare MacOS Pegasus/MAC 2.1.2 clnt ? risc.ua.edu 6/6/96 +fshare MS-Windows Pegasus/Win 2.4.2 clnt ? risc.ua.edu 8/2/96 +fshare MS-DOS Pegasus/DOS 3.3.1 clnt ? risc.ua.edu 8/2/96 +SMTP MS-DOS Charon gway ? risc.ua.edu 10/15/93 +Waffle MS-WIN Boxer clnt ? ftp.halcyon.com 12/3/93 +? MS-? pcelm clnt ? simtel 12/3/93 +? MS-? elm-pc clnt ? lister.cc.ic.ac.uk 12/3/93 +SMTP MS-WINw Internt Ex for cc:m gway yes IMA 1/31/94 +SMTP Netware Mercury 1.11 gway ? risc.ua.edu 2/4/94 +? MacOS PowerMail clnt ? Apple 2/18/94 +SMTP OS/2 PC/TCP v1.3 peer ? FTP Software 2/18/94 +MAPI MS-DOS? Microsoft Mail clnt ? Microsoft 3/2/94 +? MacOS Microsoft Mail clnt ? Microsoft 3/15/94 +VIM DOSWINMac cc:mail clnt ? Lotus 3/15/94 +MHS/G DOSWINMac DaVinci eMAIL clnt ? On Technology 4/24/96 +P7uucp DOSWINMac OpenMail clnt ? HP 3/2/94 +? DOSWINMac WordPerfect Office clnt ? WordPerfect Corp. 3/15/94 +? DOSMac MailWorks clnt ? DEC 3/2/94 +MHS/G DOSWIN BeyondMail clnt yes Banyan (beyondmail.banyan.com) +2/6/96 +? DOSOS/2 Higgins Mail clnt ? Enable Software 1/26/95 +? MacOS QuickMail 3.6 clnt ? CE Software 6/6/96 +? DOS QuickMail 3.0 clnt ? CE Software 6/6/96 +? MS-WIN QuickMail 3.5 clnt ? CE Software 6/6/96 +? MacOS QuickMail 4.0 (fut) clnt ? CE Software 6/6/96 +? ? QuickMail ? clnt yes CE Software 7/15/96 +? MS-WIN Team clnt ? Futurus 1/26/95 +? DOSWIN ExpressIT! clnt ? Infinite Technologies 1/26/95 +MAPI WIN95/NT ExpressIT! 2000 clnt ? Infinite Technologies www.ihub. +com 1/14/97 +MHS WIN95/NT ExpressIT! 2000 clnt ? Infinite Technologies www.ihub. +com 1/14/97 +VIM WIN95/NT ExpressIT! 2000 clnt ? Infinite Technologies www.ihub. +com 1/14/97 +? ? GroupWise cnlt ? Novell 1/26/95 +? DOSWINMac Lotus Notes clnt ? Lotus 3/15/94 +FCP MacOS FirstClass 2.5 clnt no SoftArc 7/12/94 +FCP MS-WIN FirstClass 2.5 clnt no SoftArc 7/12/94 +FCP MacOS FirstClass 2.5 srvr no SoftArc 7/12/94 +MHS MacOS FirstClass/MHS gway no SoftArc 7/12/94 +UUCP MacOS FirstClass/UUCP gway no SoftArc 7/12/94 +MAPI MS-WINw Mail-IT 2 clnt yes mail-it@unipalm.co.uk 7/12/94 +MAPI ? ECSmail clnt ? ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 12/16/96 +VIM ? ECSmail clnt ? ESYS Corp www.esys.ca 12/16/96 +MAPI MS-WIN SIMEON 4.1 clnt ? ESYS Corp 222.esys.ca 12/16/96 +MAPI WIN3/95/NT Z-Mail 4.0.1 clnt yes NetManage 8/22/96 www.netmanage +.com +MAPI MS-WIN Air Mail ? ? AIR Co. Ltd 10/7/94 +MAPIs MS-WIN Siren Mail ? ? Siren Software 12/28/95 +MAPIs WIN95 Siren Mail ? ? Siren Software 12/28/95 +MAPIs NTclient Siren Mail ? ? Siren Software 12/28/95 +SMTP MS-WINw Mail-IT 2 peer yes mail-it@unipalm.co.uk 7/12/94 +? MS-WINw Panda ? ? ftp.cica.indiana.edu 7/12/94 +PSS MS-Win pMail 3.0 clnt no CommTouch 9/27/94 +PSS MS-DOS pMail 3.0 clnt no CommTouch 9/27/94 +PROP MacOS BlitzMail clnt no ftp.dartmouth.edu 10/23/95 +PROP NeXT OS BlitzMail srvr no ftp.dartmouth.edu 10/23/95 +PROP DEC OSF/1 BlitzMail srvr no ftp.dartmouth.edu 10/23/95 +PROP AIX BlitzMail (in dev) srvr no ftp.dartmouth.edu 10/23/95 +PROP ? FreeMail ? ? whttp://www.montana.com/freemai +l 95/12/8 +PROP MacOS CommuniGate both ? Stalker 5/21/96 (www.stalker.co +m) +SMPT MacOS SMTPGate gway ? Stalker 3/25/96 (www.stalker.co +m) +UUCP MacOS UUCPGate gway ? Stalker 3/25/96 (www.stalker.co +m) +? MacOS Quarterdeck Mail both yes Starnine 6/11/96 (www.starnine. +com) +MAPI WIN3/NT/95 JetMail clnt yes NetManage 7/29/96 +------ ---------- ------------------- ---- ---- ------------------------------- + + + _________________________________________________________________ + +Key and Other Issues + + +(a) What are the common extensions to POP3 and which clients/servers + support them? +POP3k - Kerberos +POP3a - AFS Kerberos +POP3x - ? +POP3t - xtnd xmit facility--allows client to send mail through additional + POP commands, thus allowing server to verify/log source of mail. +POP3r - APOP +POP3m - ? +POP3u - with UIDL command. +(b) What DOS protocol stacks are supported? +MS-DOSm - Lan Manager +MS-DOSn - NDIS Drivers +MS-DOSl - Lan Workplace for Dos +MS-DOSs - Sun PCNFS +MS-DOSp - Packet Drivers +MS-DOSo - ODI Drivers +MS-DOSi - IPXLink +MS-DOSf - FTP Software PC/TCP +MS-DOSk - KA9Q I think +MS-WIN? - similar +MS-WINw - WinSock compliant +MS-WIN5 - Windows 95 +WIN3 - Windows 3.x winsock +WIN3/95/NT - Windows 3.x Winsock, Windows 95 and Windows NT +WIN3/95 - Windows 3.x Winsock and WIndows 95 +NetWare3 - NetWare 3.x +NetWare4 - NetWare 4.x +NetWare34 - NetWare 3.x and 4.x +(c) Other notes +IMAP1 - Original IMAP: I've heard that MacMS actually uses a unique + dialect of it. Definitely obselete, unsupported, discouraged. +IMAP2b - IMAP2bis: name applied to various improved versions of IMAP2. + This development effort culminated in IMAP4. +IMAP24 - IMAP2 or IMAP4 +fshare - uses file sharing. +IMAPb4 - IMAP2, IMAP2bis, or IMAP4. +IMAP41 - IMAP4rev1 +MAPI - Microsoft's Messaging API +MAPIs - Simple MAPI. +VIM - Lotus's Vendor Independent Messaging API +CMC - XAPIA's Common Message Calls API +AOCE - Apple Open Collaborative Environment +PROP - System-specific proprietary protocol +FCP - Softarc's proprietary client-server protocol. +Unix/X - X Windows based +Unix/XM - Motif based +Unix/XO - OpenWindows based +PSS - PROFS Screen Scraper +sumex-aim.stanford.edu* - almost dead as of 7/13/95, to be replaced by + info-mac.org. +Metamail - a package with which MIME messages can be processed from + basically any Unix-based mail client. +POPGate (Stalker Software) - gateway to/from Stalker's CommuniGate + system: enables both use of POP3 to get software from a POP3 server + for use within a CommuniGate community, and to allow POP3 clients to + retrieve mail from a CommuniGate server. +DigUNIX - Digital Unix +Solaris - Solaris 2.x +(d) IMAP/MAPI adaptors: +Wollongong's Pathway Access 7/12/94 +mail-it@unipalm.co.uk's Mail-IT 7/12/94 +(e) IMAP/POP3 adaptors: +Included with NCD Z-mail 4.0 for Windows 9/14/95 +------ ----------- ------------------- ------- ------------------------------- -- cgit v1.2.3