diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | fetchmail.c | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | fetchmail.man | 13 |
2 files changed, 8 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/fetchmail.c b/fetchmail.c index aa078140..b01787db 100644 --- a/fetchmail.c +++ b/fetchmail.c @@ -896,8 +896,8 @@ static int load_params(int argc, char **argv, int optind) def_opts.smtpname = (char *)0; #define ANTISPAM(n) save_str(&def_opts.antispam, STRING_DUMMY, 0)->val.status.num = (n) ANTISPAM(571); /* sendmail */ - ANTISPAM(550); /* old exim */ - ANTISPAM(501); /* new exim */ + ANTISPAM(550); /* RFC2821 */ + ANTISPAM(501); /* old exim */ ANTISPAM(554); /* Postfix */ #undef ANTISPAM diff --git a/fetchmail.man b/fetchmail.man index 83ce7a4e..ff8b44c7 100644 --- a/fetchmail.man +++ b/fetchmail.man @@ -1094,15 +1094,14 @@ Newer versions of return an error code of 571. This return value is blessed by RFC1893 as "Delivery not authorized, message refused". .PP -According to current drafts of the replacement for RFC821, the correct -thing to return in this situation is 550 "Requested action not taken: -mailbox unavailable" (the draft adds "[E.g., mailbox not found, no -access, or command rejected for policy reasons]."). +According to RFC2821, the correct thing to return in this situation is +550 "Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable" (the draft adds +"[E.g., mailbox not found, no access, or command rejected for policy +reasons]."). .PP -The +Older versions of the .I exim -MTA returns 501 "Syntax error in parameters or arguments", but will -move to 550 soon. +MTA return 501 "Syntax error in parameters or arguments". .PP The .I postfix |